• drs-blaivas-purohit-nyc-best-urologist
  • jerry-g-blavais-md-facs-best-urologist-nyc
  • jerry-g-blaivas-md-facs-urologist-specialist-author-mesh-complications-strictures

Academic and clinical excellence in a private practice setting

Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS

Dr. Blaivas is a world-renowned urological expert, surgeon, distinguished author, educator, and medical pioneer. He was one of the founders of urodynamics and established many of the current surgical procedures used to correct stress incontinence, urinary fistulas, urethral diverticulum, overactive bladder and neurogenic bladder.

He is also one of the few surgeons who routinely performs reconstructive surgery for prolapse and incontinence without the use of mesh. His success in this area has led him to publishing one of the largest series in the world on treatment of mesh complications.

Dr. Blaivas possesses decades of experience providing urology care to some of the most complex cases ever encountered, bringing academic and research-based modernization to the clinical forefront. His research in developing new medical techniques has become the standard in patient care, including breakthrough treatments and research in:

  • Mesh complications
  • Radiation complications
  • Autologous Slings
  • Natural Tissue Repairs

Dr. Blaivas was recently honored by the Canadian Journal of Urology as one of their Legends of Urology. Read the article >

Schedule an appointment online or call Dr. Blaivas today at (646) 205-3039 to schedule a confidential consultation.

Insurance Information

Dr. Blaivas does not participate with private insurance plans. He is considered an “Out of Network” physician, which means that payment in full is expected at the time of the visit and you will be reimbursed directly according to your insurance plan. As a courtesy, we offer to complete and mail claims on your behalf and assist you in obtaining timely reimbursement.

About the Uro Center of New York

At the Uro Center of New York, we combine clinical and academic excellence in a private practice setting. For over twenty years, our staff has been committed to diagnosing and treating people with bladder and prostate conditions. Our services include the use of state-of-the-art video urodynamic equipment and a custom-designed computer system that assists our physicians in ensuring an accurate and prompt diagnosis.

Learn more >

5 Things Your Doctor Might Not Reveal Before Your Pelvic Mesh Surgery

top-pelvic-mesh-expert-surgeon-surgery-specialist-nyc-faq

1) Serious, often painful complications are not uncommon

Complications can range from severe unremitting pain to a “hole”, fistula, in the bladder or vagina. Many complications are never reported and patients are told to wait but never improve. Some women are even told that the pain “is in their head”. Mesh can cause serious problems and you should ask your doctor about them BEFORE surgery!

2) Surgery using your own, natural tissue is just as effective as mesh, but without the serious complications of mesh

USE YOUR OWN TISSUE! For incontinence, a small strip of tissue above your abdominal muscles (called rectus fascia) can be used effectively instead of mesh without risking mesh’s devastating side effects. This is an option that you might not hear about because only a few doctors at specialized centers, such as Urocenter of New York, are trained to do the “meshless” surgery first pioneered and championed by Dr. Jerry Blaivas.

3) It is very difficult to remove all the mesh from your body and there are many serious complications from the removal surgery.

Mesh – so easy to put in, so hard to remove. Mesh often is placed around very sensitive structures or through delicate spaces in bones using large impaling needles. These organs are often deep in the pelvis and difficult to access. Surgical removal is difficult and should be done only by experts such as Dr. Blaivas. If your doctor put the mesh in, she’s (or he’s) probably not the person to remove it!

4) Sex may never be the same again (or even possible)

Vaginal mesh can push up against the bladder, urethra or uterus during sex making it very painful. Nerves for sensation may even grow into the mesh triggering pain with intercourse. Sometimes the male partner can even feel your mesh in you and suffer pain too!

5) The mesh that is put in your body is made up entirely of petroleum byproducts that were never intended for human use

Oil? Yuck – Not a big surprise, you weren’t told that huh?


Dr. Jerry Blaivas at UroCenter of New York is among the most experienced surgeons in the world at treating mesh complications.

Dr. Blaivas has performed hundreds of these procedures and has the largest published series in the world on urethral reconstruction, a procedure that is often necessary in treating mesh complications (Outcome of Urethral Reconstructive Surgery in a Series of 74 Women).

Call Dr. Blaivas today to schedule a consultation:

212-772-3900

For More information, visit our main website: www.urocenterofnewyork.com

The Canadian Journal of Urology™ August 2024: Legends in Urology – Jerry G. Blaivas

LEGENDS IN UROLOGY
The Canadian Journal of Urology™
August 2024

Jerry G. Blaivas, MD

Professor of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Adjunct Professor of Urology, SUNY Downstate Medical School
New York, New York, USA


To say that I am humbled to be counted amongst the luminaries who have received the honor of being recognized as a legend in urology is an understatement. Then, I read the autobiographical pieces by Helen O’Connell, and Irwin Goldstein, some recently inaugurated Legends, both of whom I know pretty well. Then my humility turned
to unease and I read the bios of some more “Legends.”

I suggest that you do the same. Start with Professor Denis’ account of himself. Please read mine first, though, so I may enjoy my own moment in the spotlight. Then, go on and read about the other Legends in Urology; quite an interesting, remarkable and inspirational group. I begin by paraphrasing the guidelines for the author of Legends in Urology.

1) Describe what I am most proud of:

a. Adhering to my own ethical/moral/intellectual standards – an amalgamation derived from my parents
and mentors (personal and virtual).
b. Doing my best to pass those standards on to others.

2) Actually, I was supposed to describe those contributions that I am most proud of.

Here they are, but I must admit, only one of these was entirely my own idea.
a. Incorporating videourodynamics into clinical practice for all patients with lower urinary tract disorders.
b. Characterizing the physiology, neurophysiology, and pathophysiology of the lower urinary tract.
c. Describing the differential diagnosis of “BPH.”
d. Developing and improving surgical techniques for autologous rectus fascial slings, augmentation and reduction cystoplasties, urethral strictures in women, and vaginal mesh complications.
e. Developing classification systems for detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, stress incontinence in women, urinary urgency, overactive bladder, and nocturia.
f. Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Neurourology and Urodynamics.
g. Co-founder of Symptelligence Medical Informatics.
h. Developer of A New Paradigm for Healthcare Delivery.

3) Why and how I selected my professional paths?

I have no idea – mostly dealing with unexpected twists of fate.

4) Who were my most impactful mentors?

A mentor is “an experienced and trusted advisor.” Herein I describe three kinds of mentors – personal, professional and virtual.

Personal mentors – my parents (Marilyn nee Shenker and Murray Blaivas, wife (Sue nee Lieberman), three daughters (Heidi, Kim and Lindsey – yes, adult kids can be “experienced advisors”), and my high school track and football coach (Irving “Moon” Mondschein).

Professional mentors – The two most important were urologists Nageswara Rao Chadalawada and Carl Olsson. Alan Retik, Edward J. McGuire, Lenny Zinman, and many others are described below. Virtual ones are countless, from history, philosophy, poetry and, oh yes, urology. Of course, they are not actually mentors; they are more like role models, but I took what they said and did so personally that, to me, they were virtual mentors. Here they are, the most impactful of many virtual mentors – Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King, Alfred, Lord Tennyson, William Wordsworth and Robert Frost, Aristotle, Plato and Immanuel Kant, and urologists Emil Tanagho and Richard Turner-Warwick and Gynecologist David Nichols.

5) What do I consider the key to my success?

Good luck, good luck, good luck, integrity, overriding intellectual curiosity, a natural affinity for writing and considerable prodding by Carl Olsson. Add to that, a little advice from Alan Wein, my good friend Jeffrey P. Weiss, and my daughter Kimberly, a lawyer by training. She was second in command of the Institute for Bladder and Prostate Research, Editorial Assistant of Neurourology and Urodynamics, and the forever editor of my written words (she may edit this out). They all teamed up with my wife, Sue, and daughters, Heidi and Lindsey to keep me from doing dumb things.

6) What lasting message do I want to leave for future generations of urologists (and other humans)?

Here is my advice (mostly paraphrased from great minds):
a. Find a job that you love, and you’ll never work a day in your life (Confucius).
b. Be prepared, do your homework, don’t bullshit. (Boy Scouts of America, Carl Olsson).
c. The opposite of “don’t bullshit” is “fake it until you make it.” If you fake it, hope to make it before they take it (away when you are caught). My advice? Don’t fake it.
d. Doing the right thing is a reward in itself (Murray Blaivas, my father).
a. A corollary to that from my good friend Emil ”Jack” Jachmann Is “Right is right even if no one is doing it and, Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.” (First attributed to St Augustine).
e. Work your hardest and give it your all; I have 100% confidence in you (Irving “Moon” Mondschein – I think he said that to all of his athletes).
f. “Learn from the mistakes of others, you can’t make them all yourself.” (Eleanor Roosevelt) A corollary to that is learn to have the thickest of skins. Consider every single criticism or insult you get carefully and ask yourself, why did that person say that? If it’s warranted, correct it. You will become a better person. If not, be wary of that person in the future.
So, how did I get to be what I am – the old nurture versus nature argument? In my case, I think it’s a little of both and a lot of luck.

With pride, Louis Dennis wrote that he’s been described as a” free thinker;” I’ve been repeatedly described as someone who “thinks outside the box.” That’s not necessarily a compliment, but I do think it’s true.

I was the first in my family to go to college. My father and his father were high school graduates; my other grandfather made it through the 8th grade. Yet, without a formal education, these three men became very successful and were all granted patents. My paternal grandfather patented one of the first devices for administering blood
transfusions and co-authored the major textbook on clinical medical laboratory medicine with a famous pathologist. He founded a clinical medical laboratory called Kings County Research Laboratory.

Like many heroes of his generation, my father enlisted in the army and fought in WW2 while my mother was pregnant with me. He came home two years later. Many others of his generation never returned, so my good luck started there.

When my father got out of the army, he joined my grandfather; together, they grew their laboratory business. It became one of the largest clinical medical labs in the world and the first to be computerized. Along the way, my father got the idea for the vacutainer tube, which he sold to Becton-Dickinson. He also patented the methodology of putting a bacterial culture medium at the bottom of a test tube containing a swab to obtain the specimen – a method still in common use today. The lab was eventually sold to Hoffman La Roche, an international healthcare behemoth, and it became Roche Diagnostics. So, these three men served as both my nature and nurture.

My parents were very kind, caring, and generous people, as was my entire extended family, all of whom made me feel like I could do anything that I put my mind to. That’s the beginning of the nurturing part. I was born in Brooklyn, NY, and lived the first 3 years of my life with my mother, grandmother, and great grandfather in a one bedroom
apartment. Then, when my father came home from the war, we moved to a tiny little house with two bedrooms – my sister and I shared the second bedroom. We moved 4 more times before I got to high school and twice more in high school, but thankfully, I spent four straight years in one town and graduated from Lawrence High School in Long Island, NY.

In high school, I focused on sports (football and track). Enter my first and most impactful mentor – Irving “Moon” Mondschein,” my high school track and football coach. He was a charismatic, inspirational person with the wisdom of Solomon, who did everything in his power to ensure everyone on his teams gave their all and rose to
the heights of their potential.

I went on to Tufts University, where I captained the track team and played varsity football until my sophomore year when I rammed my head into a big guy’s belly, whom I was supposed to block. It was like hitting a brick wall; I actually saw stars, fell to the ground, and when I lifted my head, I saw this huge creature who looked about ten
feet tall and maybe 300 pounds. At 5’10” (rounded up) and weighing 155 lbs, my football career ended.

My high school and college academic careers were relatively undistinguished, but in college, I received a superb education and learned critical thinking along the way. I barely got into medical school, but then, somehow, at end of my second year, I scored in the top 1% of the country on the National Medical Board exam.

Oh, one more thing I got out of college, my wife of 59 years, Sue. We married after my second year of medical school, and she and my three daughters remain my very best friends to this day. Sue, a psychiatric social worker, trained with a pioneering behavioral therapist, and she herself pioneered behavior therapy for LUTS and developed
many of the techniques that we still use today.

I graduated from the Tufts University School of Medicine in 1968 and began a general surgical residency at Boston City Hospital, intending to be a general surgeon. Every other night and weekend, I was on call and moonlighting lone weekend a month to make ends meet. That meant that I had one weekend off a month. Five years of general
surgery was cut short after 2, when I and our entire residency class were drafted to serve in the Vietnam conflict. I served two years as an orthopedic surgeon (go figure), presented my first-ever paper at a national meeting, and developed a profound respect for our military.

Enter my next most impactful mentor, Nageswara Rao Chadalawada. Nag was an Assistant Professor of Urology at The Tufts New England Medical Center, where I did my urology residency. As if I was not thinking enough already, Nag made me think and question everything that I knew. Every day, he asked me a question that I could not answer, and before the sun set the next day, I always had an answer for him. He and his wife, Suddha, an ophthalmologist, were the kindest people I ever met who never deviated from their single-mindedness purpose – to serve humanity. After training in the US, Nag and Suddha returned to India, where they founded a medical, dental, and nursing school and a charity that “adopted” 400 adjacent villages and provided free healthcare for their impoverished neighbors. Nag also became President of the Indian Urologic Society.

At Tufts, two gifted urologic surgeons – Bob Spellman and Alan Retik, taught me how to operate. The principles they espoused have served me well over the 4 decades since I first learned them (whether it’s robotics or open surgery) – obtain adequate exposure, handle the tissue gently, dissect with traction and counter traction, and, for
anastomoses, insure an adequate blood supply and tension free approximation of the tissue.

During those years, under the tutelage of urologists Carl Olsson, Alan Retik, Nageswara Rao, and Bob Krane and physiatrists Kamal Labib and Allain Rossier, and in collaboration with my co-residents Stu Bauer and Mike Siroky, my passion for neurogenic bladder and the application of urodynamics to voiding dysfunction in men, women and children was born. We developed and opened one of the first video-urodynamics units in the world and did video-urodynamic studies 5 days a week.

Kamal Labib was a gifted electrophysiologist who taught me the nuances of electromyography of the pelvic floor. Allain Rossier was a preeminent world authority on spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder. His mentorship was invaluable, igniting my lifelong passion for spinal cord injury. We staffed a weekly clinic for neurogenic
patients that evolved into one of the first multi-specialty clinics for patients with neurogenic bladder. Our detailed neuro-urologic evaluations provided us with a treasure trove of material for clinical research that probed into the physiology, pathophysiology, and neurophysiology of micturition. Over the ensuing eight years, we published over thirty papers on these topics.

A large surgical experience dominated my first five years in practice at Tufts – I operated 4 days a week, mostly nephrectomy, cystectomy, open stone surgeries, and TURPs. I also spent a week with F. Brantley Scott in Houston and was already doing sphincter and penile prostheses by 1977.

In 1981, I moved to the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York and was appointed Director of the Neurourology Division, Vice-Chairman of the Department, and eventually Professor of Urology. I stopped at Yale on the trip from Tufts to Columbia and spent a few days with Ed McGuire, who became a lifelong friend and mentor. Ed was a most remarkable person – a brilliant, intuitive thinker who seemed to innately understand the physiology and pathophysiology of the lower urinary tract based on his own clinical and urodynamic observations. He was a singular giant in our field, a kind man of impeccable character and a genuine war hero. He was awarded the Bronze Star and will be entombed in Arlington National Cemetery. Though he spoke but one language, Ed could tell a joke with every dialectical accent known to man – one of the funniest people I had ever met.

On that visit, Ed taught me how to do an autologous fascial pubovaginal sling. I think that it was me who modified the technique of pubovaginal sling by using the rectus fascia as a graft rather than a flap. No matter, that modification allowed us to place the sling with no tension at all. In 1998, we published a landmark paper on the use
of autologous fascial slings for women with primary stress incontinence (Chaikin et al. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: Long-term analysis. J Urol. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62524-2). Prior to that, slings were reserved for only those who had failed multiple prior procedures. I believe that set the
stage for the developing mid-urethral synthetic slings, which, in my opinion, is a double-edged sword – comparable efficacy, shorter OR time, but with too many refractory life style-altering complications compared to autologous slings (Blaivas et al. (2015). Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nature Reviews. Urology 12(9):
481-509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.183).

Once at Columbia, the focus of my clinical practice changed to the lower urinary tract, predominantly benign prostate problems, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, neurogenic bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse; I no longer did urologic oncology except for bladder cancer, which I continue to this day. Over the following decades, I continued to see patients with ordinary lower urinary tract problems, but over time I developed a reputation for seeing complex voiding dysfunction such as failed surgery for BPH, refractory overactive and neurogenic bladder, as well as reconstructive urology, including complications from pelvic radiotherapy and prostate cancer surgery,
urethral diverticulum, vesicovaginal fistula, urethral strictures, and vaginal mesh complications.

With my job at Columbia came mentor number three, Carl Olsson, Chairman of Urology at the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Carl is a brilliant man endowed with great personal fortitude and character. He is a superb educator, and he once told me something I will never forgot – the best way to learn is to teach. As I grew older, I substituted “write” for “teach” because when you write, it is forever (unless they burn your book).

In 1981, Carl inspired me to found the Journal Neurourology and Urodynamics, which became the most important peer reviewed journal for lower urinary tract disorders. It was Carl who coined the term “neurourology.” I was Editor-in-Chief for about 25 years and authored an editorial for every issue, often on controversial topics which
sparked much debate. Carl supported me with sage advice about urology, business, and politics until his recent retirement.

At Columbia, I continued a significant effort in clinical research in clinical aspects and the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract disorders, focusing on urinary incontinence, “BPH,” and neurogenic bladder. I also collaborated with Robert Levin at the University of Pennsylvania and two AFUD fellows working under my direction, Mike Chancellor and Steven Kaplan, using an isolated rabbit bladder model to explore parameters of detrusor contractility. In 1988, I published an article describing the differential diagnosis of “BPH,” based mainly on the observations of Richard

Turner-Warwick (Blaivas JG. Pathophysiology and Differential Diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Urology 32:supp5-11,1988). Up until that time, “BPH” and prostatic obstruction were considered to be synonymous, and many men underwent and failed needless prostatic surgeries.

In 1992, I joined the voluntary faculty of what is now Weill-Cornell Medical School. Shortly after that began a collaboration with Jeffery P. Weiss, who is currently Chairman of Urology at SUNY-Downstate College of Medicine, the preeminent authority on nocturia and a remarkable human being. Our primary focus is in nocturia, phenotyping
lower urinary tract disorders, developing clinical pathways, and outcomes research in lower urinary tract disorders.

In 1998 I founded the Institute for Bladder and Prostate Research. This small not-for-profit sponsors and engages in research concerning the safety and efficacy of different treatment options for men and women with lower urinary tract disorders and most recently, the development of a New Paradigm for Healthcare Delivery.

In 2013, I co-founded Symptelligence Medical Informatics, LLC, a software company that designs clinical decisionmaking and outcomes research software. This software provides the infrastructure for all of our outcomes research, phenotyping, and clinical pathway development.

In 2017, I joined the faculty of The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai under Chairman Ashok Tewari, who has built one of the finest urologic oncology programs in the world. He is a superb surgeon/scientist and a charismatic leader. I’m honored to work there and continue my journey as a surgeon and clinical research scientist, pursuing
my passion to create a New Paradigm in Healthcare Delivery (Li et al, A New Paradigm for Outpatient Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Utilizing a Mobile App/Softward Platform and Remote and In-Office Visits: A Feasibility Study. Urology Practice. 2021 January;8(1):11-17).

It’s an age-old adage that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before. I stand on many shoulders, listed above, and many more who are active in the recesses of my brain. I want to thank you all. I don’t distinguish between the living and those who’ve passed on because I believe in the soul, and I hope that some of you are listening.

Jerry G. Blaivas, MD
Professor of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Adjunct Professor of Urology, SUNY Downstate Medical School
New York, New York, USA

Urodynamics: What, When and Why?

What Is Urodynamics?

The videourodynamics (VUDS) lab at Urocenter of New York is widely considered one of the most advanced and innovative in the world.  Dr. Jerry Blaivas, one of the originators of urodynamics, has authored two definitive textbooks and has written over 200 book chapters and peer review articles on the subject. Dr. Purohit completed a fellowship with Dr. Blaivas in 2006 and between the two of them, they have performed over 25,000 video urodynamic studies. The videourodynamic study is an outpatient procedure performed at Urocenter of New York.  No preparation is necessary except for a urinalysis and culture.  No anesthesia is needed, and the results are immediately available to both physician and patient.

When Is Urodynamics Needed?

The most common reason that urodynamics (VUDs) is done is to evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms, or LUTS, but most patients with LUTS do not require VUDs because they can be treated okay without it. VUDs is needed when treatments are not working and/or in patients who are considering surgery to correct their LUTS.  Patients with neurologic conditions like multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and spinal cord injury (neurogenic bladder) may also require VUDs because of conditions like low bladder compliance (kind of like high blood pressure of the bladder) or destrusor sphincter dyssynergia (a blockage)  which may put patients at risk of kidney damage.

The lower urinary tract is made up of the bladder, the prostate (in men), the urethra and the sphincter. In men, the urethra runs through the prostate.  The bladder is analogous to a balloon that gradually expands as it fills, and the sphincter pinches the urethra closed and holds back the urine until it is time to go. Urination occurs when the bladder contracts and the sphincter relaxes open. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are comprised of what are called “storage” and “voiding” symptoms. Storage symptoms include urinary frequency and urgency (having to rush to the bathroom), urinary incontinence (urine leakage) and night time urination (nocturia). Voiding symptoms are problems getting urine out – symptoms include urinary hesitancy (delay in getting urine flow started), weak stream, straining to urinate and urinary retention (inability to urinate at all).

Why Urodynamics?

The purpose of urodynamics is to determine the cause of LUTS. Small catheters are passed into the bladder and rectum, sphincter EMG is recorded with patch electrodes and the entire process is monitored fluoroscopically while filling the bladder with radiographic contrast.

The VUDs study is comprised of the following tests: 

  1. Uroflowmetry: Measures urine flow.
  2. Cystometry: Measures bladder pressure during filling and voiding, and bladder sensations and control are assessed.
  3. Pressure Flow Study: Measures detrusor pressure and uroflow synchronously; it is the only method by which urethral obstruction can be diagnosed with certainty.
  4. Electromyogram: This monitors the activity of the sphincter muscle. 
  5. Fluoroscopy: Depicts lower urinary tract anatomy using x-rays and dye during filling and voiding and is the only method by which the site of urethral obstruction can be diagnosed with certainty.

Possible Complications From The Test:

  1. Urinary tract infection (UTI).
  2. Painful or frequent urination that may last up to about twenty-four hours.
  3. Difficulty urinating or inability to urinate at all, and blood in the urine (hematuria).

These complications are rare, occurring in less than 5% of patients; Most of the patients who experience these complications have preexisting conditions which makes a complication much more likely to occur.

We generally treat with a prophylactic antibiotic just prior to the procedure to prevent infection. For patients with preexisting conditions that make a UTI more likely, we will let the patient know and take the necessary precautions.

For more informations on Urodynamics, call Urocenter of New York today:

Uro Center of New York
Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS
445 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10075
646-205-3039

Urethrovaginal Fistulas

For women who suffer from urethrovaginal fistulas, the situation is even more complicated because, in addition to fixing the fistula, it is usually necessary to do an anti-incontinence operation at the same time.

However, not all urethrovaginal fistulas create a problem and not all have to be surgically mended. If a urethrovaginal fistula is discovered during an examination by your urologist, but you have no symptoms or incontinence, there is no need to fix it. However, if incontinence is present, it usually means that the fistula affects not only the urethra, but the sphincter and bladder neck as well.

Surgeries to repair these types of injuries are much more complicated than the repair of a vesicovaginal fistula and require a very experienced surgeon. First, the surgeon has to fix the urethra, and then he has to repair the incontinence.

Because he or she is performing so much surgery in such a small space, it is typically wise to bring in a new blood supply to insure the best chance for healing. This can be done with a Martius labial fat pad graft. Despite the complexity of this surgery, in experienced hands, the overall success rate is over 90% with respect to continence and a successful fistula repair.

How Do You Repair Urethrovaginal Fistulas?

Typically, there are three different approaches to repairing these injuries:

  1. Anterior bladder flaps (Tanagho procedure)
  2. Posterior bladder flaps (Young-Dees-Leadbetter procedure)
  3. Vaginal wall flaps.

Although these techniques seem similar with respect to repairing the fistula, incontinence persists in about half of the women unless it is repaired at the same time. Dr. Jerry Blaivas, world renowned surgeon at Urocenter of New York advises that there is almost never a need to do anything but a vaginal repair combined with pubovaginal sling and Martius flap. Urologists Dr. Blaivas believes that vaginal reconstruction is considerably easier and faster, is much more amenable to concomitant anti-incontinence surgery and has a much easier recovery with much fewer complications and less blood loss.

Vesico-vaginal and urethro-vaginal fistulas (holes in the vagina connected to the bladder and urethra) are rare in industrialized countries, but are common in the third world because of inadequate obstetric care. The only treatment is surgical and in the hands of experienced surgeons the success rate is very high.

Even if the surgery should fail, a second operation or even a third will almost always be successful in expert hands. Whenever a fistula is diagnosed, a careful search for associated injuries to the ureter should be undertaken and, if found, these injuries should be repaired at the same time.

If you are interested in more information regarding vesico-vaginal and urethro-vaginal fistulas, contact reconstructive urologist Dr. Jerry G. Blaivas at the URO Center of New York.

Call today to schedule a consultation:

Urocenter of New York
646-205-3039

Urethral Strictures in Women

Urethral strictures in women are rare, and they account for only about 15% of women with BOO. Urethral obstruction in women is functional or anatomical.

When the obstruction is anatomical, it can be secondary to compression or scar. Compressive obstruction can result from prolapse, urethral diverticulum or tumor. Strictures may be iatrogenic, idiopathic or traumatic, or as a result of deterioration.

Because urethral strictures are so uncommon and high quality studies are few and far between, the management of urethral strictures in women is largely experimental. Treatment options typically include urethral dilation, self-catheterization, urethrotomy and urethroplasty.

Although data is limited, it appears that urethral dilation is of benefit only in the short term, which is measured in months, not years. In our study, only 1 of 17 patients had a continual response to urethral dilation alone. This suggests that definitive surgical treatment should be considered when conservative measures fail or when stricture is associated with partial or complete loss of the urethral wall. 

Urethral Strictures in Women: Techniques

A variety of surgical techniques have been described for urethral strictures in women, including VFU, dorsal urethroplasty with labia minora, lingual graft, skin graft or pedicle flap, vestibular flap urethroplasty and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Each procedure utilizes a variation on two basic urethroplasty approaches – the vaginal flap and vaginal wall grafts.

Vaginal flap neourethral restoration for urethrovaginal fistula was first described in 1935. After urethral catheterization has been completed, a U-shaped flap is created on the anterior vaginal wall. The stricture is incised and the flap is advanced, which avoids grafting or tunneling the tissue and has few problems.

Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty has been successfully applied to both male and female urethral stricture disease. Advantages include hairless tissue that is accustomed to a damp environment and has elasticity. It is an option when there is inadequate vaginal tissue for grafting.

What is Urocenter of New York’s Experience Treating Urethral Strictures in Women?

For treatments of urethral strictures at URO Center of New York, the urethra is incised dorsally until healthy proximal urethra is identified. We use the resistance experienced during the withdrawal to assess the residual stricture. Subsequently, the graft is sutured into the urethra and covered with periurethral tissue.

Bottom Line: Urethral stricture is uncommon in women and literature on the topic is sparse. In our experience with 17 consecutive women with urethral stricture seen in a 12-year period, urethral dilation was rarely effective.

Urethroplasty had a 100% success rate at 1 year in 9 women but strictures recurred at 6 years in 2 who underwent ventral vaginal flap urethroplasty, requiring repeat urethroplasty with a buccal mucosal graft. Women with urethral strictures should be monitored for a longer term due to the small risk of recurrence.

Dr. Jerry Blaivas is the World Leading Expert on Complicated Urological Problems

For more information regarding urethral strictures in women, visit our website or call us at 646-205-3039 for an appointment.

Uro Center of New York
Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS
445 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10075
646-205-3039

Questions About Sling And Prolapse Repairs Without Mesh?

The FDA has warned about serious complications resulting from synthetic sling surgery for the treatment of incontinence in women. This has prompted researchers to investigate new ways to continue to achieve the high success rate associated with this surgery without the devastating complications that can result. At URO Center, urologist Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS perform an operation with a success rate that is just as high, but without the potentially serious complications.

Some may think it’s a new operation, but it’s not. And it works very effectively with practically no serious complications. In addition, both urologists New York are experts at performing the procedure. In fact, Dr. Blaivas was the first ever to recommend non-mesh slings as the standard treatment for stress incontinence in women. Dr. Blaivas has written chapters in many major textbooks focusing on fascial slings, and his work is typically referenced when others write about non-mesh slings.

Frequently Asked Questions About Sling And Prolapse Repairs Without Mesh

What is a sling?

A sling is ribbon-like substance made up of natural tissue, called fascia, or synthetic mesh that is positioned like a hammock under the urethra in surgical procedures performed to relieve urinary incontinence.

How does it work?

When you cough, sneeze, exercise, or do anything that causes your abdomen to push down, it forces down the bladder and urethra (where the urine comes out) and squeezes it against the sling just like you would compress a water hose by stepping on it to stop the flow of water.

If it works so effectively, why does anyone use synthetic slings and run the risk of serious complications?

Fascial slings require more expertise and many urologists New York are not trained to perform the surgery.

Secondly, the operation is performed through a small incision made in the lower abdomen that can leave a scar that can result in a hernia. The scars resulting from the mesh sling procedures are tiny and there is little risk for a hernia to occur.

Third, fascial sling surgery requires general or regional anesthesia and takes up to two hours, while mesh operations typically take just 30 minutes or less, and can be performed as an outpatient under local anesthesia.

If you’re suffering from mesh complications and are in need of an expert urologist, patients form all over the world trust best NYC urologist Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS to help. Call us today to schedule a confidential consultation.

Dr. Jerry G. Blaivas
646-205-3039

Bladder Problems: Do You Have Neurogenic Bladder?

Bladder Problems | Best Urologist NYC

According to urologist New York at the URO Center, if you’re experiencing bladder problems, you may have neurogenic bladder. This is the name given to a variety of urinary conditions and is the result of difficulties with nerves that control how the bladder stores or voids urine.

These conditions include overactive bladder, incontinence, and obstructive bladder. Many women and men experience these bladder problems, including people who suffer with illness and injury that affect the brain and/or the spinal cord.

What are the causes associated with neurogenic bladder?

According to your urologist New York, in patients with neurogenic bladder, the nerves and muscles don’t operate together in the correct way. For example, the bladder may not fill or void correctly due to nerve damage. Bladder muscles may be overactive and contract involuntarily more often than usual and before the bladder is filled with urine.

Sometimes muscles are too loose and they allow urine to pass before you’re ready. In some other cases, the bladder muscle may be underactive, which occurs when it will not contract when filled with urine and won’t empty entirely. The sphincter muscles surrounding the urethra may also not function properly, remaining tight when you try to release urine.

What are the symptoms associated with neurogenic bladder?

The symptoms differ from person to person and depend on the type of damage they have experienced. Some symptoms include:

  • Incontinence;
  • Urgent urination;
  • Frequent urination;
  • Urinary retention;
  • Recurrent urinary tract infections.

How is this condition diagnosed?

Your urologist New York may diagnose your neurogenic bladder using methods such as:

  • Reviewing your past and present health;
  • Performing a physical exam;
  • Asking you to keep a bladder diary;
  • Performing a Pad Test;
  • Collecting urine to test for infection or blood;
  • Conducting a series of tests such as a bladder scan or urodynamic test.

Your urologist New York may need to perform additional imaging tests such as x-rays and CT scans to diagnose your condition.

The treatment is designed to control your symptoms while preventing damage to your kidneys. Treatment will be dependent on the symptoms you are experiencing, and the cause of your neurogenic bladder.  However, regardless of the cause, treatments are concentrated on improving the patient’s quality of life.

It’s vital that you determine what is causing your symptoms before they lead to more serious bladder problems.

If you are having bladder problems or need urinary treatment, you can rely on the expert care provided by the best urologist Dr. Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS at the New York URO Center:

Uro Center of New York
Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS
445 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10075
646-205-3039

Is Permanent Urinary Catheterization Really Permanent?

Urinary catheterization is used in three instances: (1) temporarily, for people who cannot urinate following a surgery or for monitoring urinary output; (2) long term for people who cannot urinate well; and (3) for people with terrible incontinence for whom there appears to be no other solution.

This article is concerned with the management of patients on “permanent” urinary catheterization – either an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization. An indwelling catheter refers to one that is left in all the time and changed about once a month. Indwelling catheters are placed either through the urethra or the lower abdomen (suprapubic catheter). Intermittent catheterization refers to a technique whereby the patient (or a caregiver) passes the catheter periodically throughout the day instead of urinating.

There are two major reasons why a patient cannot urinate: either the bladder does not contract well, or there is a blockage (bladder outlet obstruction). The muscle around the bladder that causes it to contract is called the “detrusor.” Impaired detrusor contractility AKA detrusor underactivity (DU) is how we refer to a bladder that does not contract well, and an acontractile detrusor is a bladder muscle that will not contract at all.

What comes first?

Patients are often treated with an indwelling catheter when they are not able to urinate well. Because of the risk of infection, catheters should stay in for the least amount of time possible. If an indwelling catheter is necessary, it should be changed every three to four weeks, but for the vast majority of patients intermittent catheterization is preferable and much safer – see our last blog post for more information.

When presented with a patient who has an indwelling catheter, in most instances, an “active voiding trial” is recommended; the bladder is filled up with fluid using the catheter that is already in place. When the patient feels that he is full, the catheter is removed and the patient is instructed to try to urinate into a urine flow meter, and the bladder is checked to see how completely it empties with an ultrasound. The active voiding trial differs from a regular voiding trial in the amount of time it takes. The voiding trial involves removing the catheter and waiting until the patient has to urinate. Sometimes when the patient has voided a little, he is sent home and develops urinary retention (is unable to urinate at all) later that night. The active voiding trial provides more information about bladder function in a shorter amount of time.

If a patient cannot void during the active voiding trial, in our judgment, the patient should be taught intermittent urinary catheterization and should catheterize every three to six hours. Each time, he can attempt to void first. As soon as the patient improves, both he and his doctor will know.

Will I have a urinary catheter for the rest of my life?

We believe that a large percentage of men treated who had been condemned to permanent urinary catheterization could be better treated by an operation to relieve the bladder outlet obstruction that often coexists with DU . In a study we conducted (and recently updated) with fifty-four men being treated with intermittent catheterization for impaired detrusor contractility – only seventeen still needed to catheterize following a TURP (trans-urethral resection of the prostate) or KTPLAP (KTP laser ablation of the prostate).[1] So, almost 70% of patients who had been condemned to a life with a catheter were catheter free after a simple operation. In a separate study, we demonstrated that reduction cystoplasty can also be an effective operation for patients being treated with catheterization.[2]

Why hasn’t my doctor treated me with Surgery before?

In our opinion, many doctors do not diagnose obstruction accurately in patients presenting with impaired DU. At least thirty percent of men with lower urinary tract symptoms have a weak bladder, which many doctors will treat with a catheter. But with a proper urodynamic study – a sophisticated diagnostic test for urinary symptoms – it is possible to diagnose obstruction even when the bladder only contracts weakly. Most men treated with a permanent urinary catheter can turn in their catheters for surgery instead.

In fact, even if you’ve already had surgery and have been told that there is no other treatment except a catheter, there is still a good chance that you will have a successful outcome after another prostate operation [3].

Contact Dr. Blaivas Today for the Best Urinary Catheterization Options

If you need to consult with an expert to determine your best catheter options, contact Dr. Blaivas today to schedule an appointment. Dr. Blaivas is a world renowned surgeon specializing in common and complex urological conditions.

Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, FACS
445 East 77th Street
New York, NY 10075

646-205-3039


References:

[1] Blaivas, J., M. Tyler, J. Aizen, A. Badri, M. Benedon, and J. Weiss. “TURP/KTPLAP Is an Effective Treatment for Men with Detrusor Underactivity.” Neurourology and Urodynamics 33.6 (2014): 988-89.

[2] Blaivas, Jerry, Jeffrey Weiss, Johnson Tsui, Mahyar Kashan, James Weinberger, and Daniel Thorner. “Outcomes of Reduction Cystoplasty in Men With Impaired Detrusor Contractility.” Urology 83.4 (2014): 882-87. Apr. 2014. Web.

[3.] Blaivas, JG, Liaw, C, Policastro, L, Dayan, L Diagnosis and Treatment of Catheter-Dependent Men after Tansurethral Resection of the Prostate and Laser Failures, J Urol, 199(4S), p. e999, 2018

Self Intermittent Catheterization; Can it Work for You?

What is self intermittent catheterization? If you suffer from incontinence or bladder problems that require the use of a catheter, read on to learn about this more convenient catheterization method.

If you’ve ever been to a urologist because you can’t urinate, you might have been given an indwelling catheter – a catheter that stays in the bladder and drains into a bag, usually attached to your leg – and been told to wait until the bladder recovers and return in a few days or a week. Sometimes this is from obstruction from an enlarged prostate (BPH) or from a bladder that doesn’t work properly (acontractile bladder) or a neurologic problem (Neurogenic bladder).

What is Self Intermittent Catheterization (SIC)?

top-nyc-urologist-for-self-intermittent-catheterization-sic-01

“Self Intermittent Catheterization” (SIC) or “Clean Intermittent Catheterization” (CIC) is an alternative to leaving in an indwelling catheter. If you’re new to the world of urology (and even if you’re not) this might sound like something you couldn’t or wouldn’t want to do. This is not uncommon, but the feeling comes from a lack of knowledge or experience.

As you might have guessed from the name, SIC is when a patient inserts a catheter him/herself and allows the bladder to drain to completion before removing it. If this sounds simple, that’s because it is. Until the bladder recovers or is treated, you will catheterize yourself at intervals throughout the day to empty your bladder. Before each catheterization, you can try to urinate so you will be able to mark your own progress. If you get better, with the advice of your doctor, you will be able to stop catheterizing.

What Are The Benefits of SIC?

SIC might be useful to you as a temporary solution while waiting for your bladder to recover after surgery, or while you wait for other therapies; or it can be a permanent solution over the course of a lifetime if you have been diagnosed with permanent incontinence or urinary retention (though, as you’ll see in a future blog post, we’ve found that many patients diagnosed with untreatable urinary retention are eventually able to urinate okay with proper treatment).

In the rare case that you have a permanent problem, being able to catheterize yourself means you do not have to struggle with an indwelling catheter for the rest of your life, which can be uncomfortable and limiting and has a higher risk of infection, and even a small risk of developing cancer. Instead, you can control when you go to the bathroom, and you can take the catheter back out and continue to live your life as normal. For many, intermittent catheterization successfully replaces normal urination.

Will There Be Urination Complications?

Many people also find that they cannot urinate following various kinds of surgeries. Traditionally, the treatment for this would be an indwelling catheter until such a point when the physician felt the patient should be able to urinate then perform a “voiding trial.” This is the practice of removing the catheter and waiting for the patient to urinate. If the patient is unable to pee when the bladder is full, many physicians will reinsert the indwelling catheter until they feel the patient is ready to try again. This can put a lot of pressure on that patient’s first urination, and many will not be able to urinate to completion on their first try.

If the patient learns SIC instead of having a catheter reinserted, he can attempt to urinate every time he feels the urge and catheterize afterward for any residual urine. Once the residual shrinks to almost nothing, SIC can be discontinued.

Questions & Concerns About SIC

questions-concerns-catheter-uncontinence-trouble-urinating-nyc-expertAt the UroCenter of New York, it’s not uncommon to hear from our patients that they’re afraid to try SIC, or that it’s absolutely not for them. Some of the questions we hear are: “Is it going to hurt?” “How will I know when it’s in far enough?” “Don’t I need to use sterile gloves?” Sterile technique has been proven to be unnecessary for the vast majority of patients, although some doctors and patients prefer it. Though SIC is not a guarantee against infection, the risk is far lower than an indwelling catheter or living with a residual urine. All that is required is that you wash your hands before and after the procedure and clean the penis or the labia around the entrance to the urethra.

The process itself is pretty simple. Once everything is clean, you apply lubricant to the tip of the catheter and gently slide it into the urethra. For women, a well-placed mirror can be helpful to locate the urethral opening (meatus) while you are learning, but will not be necessary afterwards. For men, the penis should be held at a forty-five degree angle from the body until the urine begins to come through the catheter; at which point he should aim the penis down and let gravity do the rest. Like most things, the more you do it, the easier it gets. At first, the patient will know that he or she has successfully reached the bladder when the urine begins to flow through the catheter, but eventually some patients can do it entirely by feel.

Does Self Intermittent Catheterization Hurt?

Though it may seem scary at first, for most people it actually doesn’t hurt at all. The very first catheterization can be uncomfortable, especially as you learn the technique, but once you’ve mastered SIC and performed it a few times the whole process becomes as easy and painless as a regular urination. In fact, in our office, we’ve often heard patients say, “That’s it?” following their first lesson. Catheterizing yourself is easier than having someone else do it.

One more thing. Most doctors and most patients think that it’s necessary to use a new sterile catheter each time you catheterize yourself. For the overwhelming majority of patients, this is simply untrue. In the vast majority of patients, all that is necessary is a single catheter and perhaps a spare that you carry around with you all the time and simply wash it out in the sink after each use. There is no need for sterile gloves only some lubricant which can be carried in individual packets the catheter and the packets of lubricant can be carried in a little plastic baggie.

Contact Dr. Balivas at Urocenter of New York

If you’re having trouble urinating or are suffering from incontinence, you should see a urologist to figure out the correct diagnosis and treatment. Dr. Jerry Blaivas treats each case individually and works with the patient to find the best treatment option that works for them and their lifestyle. Together we will determine if self intermittent catheterization is the right option for you.

Call today to schedule your confidential consultation:

646-205-3039

For more information, visit our main website: http://www.urocenterofnewyork.com

Is a Vasectomy Right for Me?

I’ve heard of a vasectomy. What is it?

A vasectomy is a simple surgical procedure that permanently protects against pregnancy. It is an operation for men otherwise known as “male sterilization,” that prevents sperm from leaving the man’s body and prevents the partner from getting pregnant.

How is a vasectomy done?

A vasectomy is a simple, quick operation that is done in a doctor’s office, hospital, or clinic. It is an outpatient surgery in which you do not have to be put “to sleep” during the procedure, and you can go home the same day.

The vas deferens are 2 small tubes in the scrotum that leave the testicles, carrying sperm and allowing them to mix with other fluids to form semen. Normally, the semen ejaculated from a man during sex contains sperm, and the man’s sperm to find and join up with the woman’s egg and cause pregnancy. “Vasectomy” is named for the “vas” in “vas deferens.” In a vasectomy, a doctor cuts or blocks each of the 2 vas deferens tubes, sealing off the road for sperm to get into the semen fluid.

Starting about 3 months after a vasectomy, sperm will no longer be part of the semen because they cannot be transported past the cut or block where the vasectomy was done. The sperm stay in the testicles and get absorbed by the body. Since there are no sperm in the semen, the semen cannot make a woman pregnant even if it gets into a vagina.

Vasectomies are very safe procedures. Complications are rare, but they can include swelling, bruising, and infection. These complications are not serious, but they should be seen by a doctor.

What happens right after a vasectomy?

Right after the surgery, it is common to feel a bit sore. Resting for about a day can be helpful. Full recovery occurs in less than one week after the procedure.

After a few days, men can have sex again normally. It can take a few months for the sperm to stop getting into the semen after a vasectomy, so it is still important to use another form of birth control during sex during that time to prevent pregnancy. After about 10-20 orgasms or ejaculations after the procedure, men can have a test done to see if there are any sperm in his semen. Once the test shows that there are no sperm in the semen, which is usually about 3 months after the procedure, a man who has had a vasectomy will no longer need to take any additional birth control steps before sex, like putting on a condom.

Note that a vasectomy is a highly effective form of birth control, but it will not prevent sexually transmitted infections. If you are a male with a sexually transmitted infection, condoms are still needed to prevent their transmission to your partner.

Is a vasectomy right for me?

Vasectomies are a great birth control option for men who are positive that they do not want to get someone pregnant for the rest of their life. They are almost 100% effective at preventing pregnancies. Vasectomies are usually not able to be reversed. They should be considered permanent male birth control.

Men who have had vasectomies can still orgasm or ejaculate after the procedure. Men will still produce the same amount of semen and ejaculate the same way and amount during sex. A vasectomy does not change the way ejaculating or orgasming occurs or feels, and it doesn’t change the look, feel, taste, or smell of the semen that was ejaculated. It does not affect a man’s testosterone level, sex drive, or any other part of your sex life. After a vasectomy, the only change is that there are no sperm in the fluid that gets released, so it can’t get anyone pregnant.

If you are sure that you do not want to get anyone else pregnant and you are interested in a vasectomy, contact us today to schedule an appointment with the best urologist in NYC to see if a vasectomy is right for you.

Visit our main website at www.UrocenterofNewYork.com for more information.